Readings

Each week, students should select and read one paper from each category (Theory and Design). Students will rotate through giving a brief overview presentation on their selected Theory papers. 

WEEK 1 (Due for class 9/15)
Readings available here

Theory Readings:

Khalsa, S. S., et al. (2018). Interoception and Mental Health: A Roadmap. Biological Psychiatry. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 3(6), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.12.004

Adams, A. T., Costa, J., Jung, M. F., & Choudhury, T. (2015). Mindless Computing: Designing Technologies to Subtly Influence Behavior. Proceedings of the… ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. UbiComp (Conference), 2015, 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2805843

Design Readings:

Schoeller, F., Haar, A. J. H., Jain, A., & Maes, P. (2019). Enhancing human emotions with interoceptive technologies. Physics of Life Reviews, 31, 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2019.10.008 

Costa, J. EmotionCheck: leveraging bodily signals and false feedback to regulate our emotions.https://doi.org/10.1145/2971648.2971752

Hosale, M.-D., Batdorf, E., Digby, K., & Macy, A. (2019). Performance, Art, and Cyber-Interoceptive Systems (PACIS). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Movement and Computing, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3347122.3347142

Papadopoulou, A., Berry, J., Knight, T., & Picard, R. (2019). Affective Sleeve: Wearable Materials with Haptic Action for Promoting Calmness. Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions, 304–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21935-2_23

Supplemental / optional readings (not for presentation):

Brown, A. D., & Curhan, J. R. (2013). The polarizing effect of arousal on negotiation. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1928–1935.

Werner, N. S., Jung, K., Duschek, S., & Schandry, R. (2009). Enhanced cardiac perception is associated with benefits in decision-making. Psychophysiology, 46(6), 1123–1129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00855.x

WEEK 2 (Due for class 9/22)
Readings available here

Theory Readings:

Leung, A. K.-Y., Kim, S., Polman, E., Ong, L. S., Qiu, L., Goncalo, J. A., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2012). Embodied Metaphors and Creative “Acts.” Psychological Science, 23(5), 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429801

Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N. (2012). Fluid movement and creativity.Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 141(4), 625–629. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027395

McGaugh, J. L. (2018). Emotional arousal regulation of memory consolidation. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.10.003

Design Readings:

Andolfi, V. R., Di Nuzzo, C., & Antonietti, A. (2017). Opening the mind through the body: The effects of posture on creative processes. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.012

Mueller, F. ’floyd’, Kari, T., Li, Z., Wang, Y., Mehta, Y. D., Andres, J., Marquez, J., & Patibanda, R. (2020). Towards Designing Bodily Integrated Play. Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374931

Chapter 1: “Why We Need Soma Design”. Höök, K., Friedman, K., & Stolterman, E. (2018). Designing with the BodySomaesthetic Interaction Design. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Supplemental / optional readings (not for presentation):

Werner, N. S., Peres, I., Duschek, S., & Schandry, R. (2010). Implicit memory for emotional words is modulated by cardiac perception. Biological Psychology, 85(3), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.08.008

Week 3 (Due for class 9/29)
Readings available here

Theory Readings:

Bach-y-Rita, P. (1987). Brain Plasticity as a Basis of Sensory Substitution. Journal of Neurologic Rehabilitation, 1(2), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/136140968700100202

Majid, A., Roberts, S. G., Cilissen, L., Emmorey, K., Nicodemus, B., O’Grady, L., Woll, B., LeLan, B., de Sousa, H., Cansler, B. L., Shayan, S., de Vos, C., Senft, G., Enfield, N. J., Razak, R. A., Fedden, S., Tufvesson, S., Dingemanse, M., Ozturk, O., … Levinson, S. C. (2018). Differential coding of perception in the world’s languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(45), 11369–11376. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1720419115

Suarez, D., Navas, D. A., Baysan, U., & Connolly, K. (2018). Sensory Substitution and Non-Sensory Feelings. In F. Macpherson (Ed.), Sensory Substitution and Augmentation. Oxford University Press. https://philpapers.org/rec/SUASSA

Design Readings:

Schumann, F., & O’Regan, J. K. (2017). Sensory augmentation: integration of an auditory compass signal into human perception of space. Scientific Reports, 7, 42197. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42197

Reed, C. M., Tan, H. Z., Perez, Z. D., Wilson, E. C., Severgnini, F. M., Jung, J., Martinez, J. S., Jiao, Y., Israr, A., Lau, F., Klumb, K., Turcott, R., & Abnousi, F. (2019). A Phonemic-Based Tactile Display for Speech Communication. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 12(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2018.2861010

Tan, H. Z., Durlach, N. I., Reed, C. M., & Rabinowitz, W. M. (1999). Information transmission with a multifinger tactual display. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(6), 993–1008. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03207608

(Video) David Eagleman: Can We Create New Senses For Humans? https://www.ted.com/talks/david_eagleman_can_we_create_new_senses_for_humans

Week 5 (Due for class 10/13)
Readings available here

Theory Readings:

Berto, R., Baroni, M. R., Zainaghi, A., & Bettella, S. (2010). An exploratory study of the effect of high and low fascination environments on attentional fatigue. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.12.002 

Slepian, M. L., Weisbuch, M., Pauker, K., Bastian, B., & Ambady, N. (2014). Fluid Movement and Fluid Social Cognition. In Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (Vol. 40, Issue 1, pp. 111–120). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213506467 

Optional:
Gonzalez, M. F., & Aiello, J. R. (2019). More than meets the ear: Investigating how music affects cognitive task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 25(3), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000202

Design Readings:

Zhao, Nan, Asaph Azaria, and Joseph A. Paradiso. “Mediated atmospheres: A multimodal mediated work environment.” Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1.2 (2017): 1-23.

Ishii, Hiroshi, et al. “ambientROOM: integrating ambient media with architectural space.” CHI 98 conference summary on Human factors in computing systems. 1998.

Heun, Valentin, Anette von Kapri, and Pattie Maes. “Perifoveal display: combining foveal and peripheral vision in one visualization.” Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. 2012.

Week 6 (Due for class 10/20)
Readings available here

Theory Readings:
Epstein, R. A., Patai, E. Z., Julian, J. B., & Spiers, H. J. (2017). The cognitive map in humans: spatial navigation and beyond. Nature Neuroscience, 20(11), 1504–1513. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4656

Kirsh, D. (2009). Problem Solving and Situated Cognition. The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, 264–306. https://philpapers.org/rec/DAVPSA-2

Design Readings:
Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258715

Webb, A. M., Fowler, H., Kerne, A., Newman, G., Kim, J.-H., & Mackay, W. E. (2019). Interstices: Sustained Spatial Relationships between Hands and Surfaces Reveal Anticipated Action. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300818

Rosello, O., Exposito, M., & Maes, P. (2016). NeverMind: Using Augmented Reality for Memorization. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 215–216. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984751.2984776

Week 8 (Due for class 11/3)
Readings available here

Theory Readings:

Fay, A. J., & Maner, J. K. (2012). Warmth, spatial proximity, and social attachment: The embodied perception of a social metaphor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1369–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.017

Chanel, G., & Mühl, C. (2015). Connecting Brains and Bodies: Applying Physiological Computing to Support Social Interaction. Interacting with Computers, 27(5), 534–550. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwv013

Design Readings:

Hollan, J., & Stornetta, S. (1992). Beyond being there. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1145/142750.142769 

Ham, J., Evers, V., & Lohse, M. (2013). Robots Sing the Body Electric: Investigations of Body Language for Social and Spatial Interaction. In International Journal of Social Robotics (Vol. 5, Issue 3, pp. 309–311). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-013-0203-1 

Nguyen, D. T., & Canny, J. (2007). Multiview: improving trust in group video conferencing through spatial faithfulness. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1465–1474. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240846 

Week 9 (Due for class 11/10)
Readings available here

Theory Readings:

Bedder, R. L., Bush, D., Banakou, D., Peck, T., Slater, M., & Burgess, N. (2019). A mechanistic account of bodily resonance and implicit bias. Cognition, 184, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.010 

Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (n.d.). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893 

Design Media:

(Required for all students before our Q&A session in class)
Watch the first half of this video, through the end of the “Context” section (around 23 minutes).

Week 10 (Due for class 11/17)
Readings available here

Mueller, Florian Floyd, Lopes, Pedro, Strohmeier, Paul, Ju, Wendy, Seim, Caitlyn et al. 2020. “Next Steps for Human-Computer Integration.” Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings.

Allhoff, F., Lin, P., Moor, J., & Weckert, J. (2010). Ethics of Human Enhancement: 25 Questions & Answers. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1110